Wednesday, April 12, 2006

The Value of Making Mistakes in Tech Education

While looking for something else, I found this book, In Search of Stupidity. I'm putting it on my summer reading list. You can find a description and purchase info at Amazon.com.

It got me thinking about the Literacy and Technology class. We've developed a sense of community that enables us to take risks in trying out new technologies in class together and in our own classrooms with kids. There are many reasons this worked (including small class size, a Mac-using professor in a PC lab, every student being a veteran teacher with lots of successes in his/her past), and one of the things we've wondered aloud together about is how we can translate and transfer what we've learned and experienced to colleagues in other settings. It seems to me that the stories in this book, and our own attitudes and modeling (i.e., willingness to try new things we may not fully understand, willingness to learn from and with our students) are important components of whatever we do.

The book, by the way, chronicles 20 years of tech marketing disasters. At the book's website, is a quote, " Remember: The race goes not to the strong, nor the swift, nor more intelligent, but to the less stupid." The lesson, I think, is that if multi-billion-dollar companies can make humongous mistakes, then individual teachers have full permission to make individual missteps.

1 Comments:

Blogger Ms. Wollak said...

I have really enjoyed this class. It has been wonderful learning along with all of you. I have been able to read all the blogs, read all the articles I could get access to, and even listen to your class discussions. I must admit that I have been reluctant to make comments, because I am not in North Carolina with your class.I just hold think alouds with myself! The only problem with this class for me is not being able to get a "grade". (ha ha)

I feel like I know everyone in your class and thought I'd at least offer my two cents from Minnesota.

James mentioned having problems getting his scan and read program to work. (probably Kurzweil)Dave, please feel free to give James my email address or phone number. I'd be happy to help him troubleshoot problems. Kurzweil and Wynn aren't all that difficult to get to work. The most difficult part is making sure you have a compatible scanner. Now someone said they "would kill" for the program. I've got to say I'm a whole less enthusiastic about scan and read programs. First of all, they are only really helpful for a few number of kids--those kiddos who have strong language skills and poor word identification skills. (I have had to explain to parents and a few teachers that having the computer read a book that is at the 10th grade reading level for someone whose language comprehension is at the third grade level is not going to be helpful.) Secondly, the process is very time-consuming. With a standard scanner it takes about a minute to scan each page. If the page has unusual font, etc. the computer translates that as gobbledygook. You then have to clean up the text before it is useable. This is what really takes the time. I do have to say that these programs are good for kids who have print processing issues. You can change the spacing between letters, words, and sentences easily. If someone wants a scan and read program, Premier Assistive Technology offers a good one (readingmadeeasy.com)for a reasonable price ($150). Unfortunately, it is pc only.

Dave, you mentioned, that Clicker is a lot like the other two talking word processors you had mentioned. Although it can be, I have found Clicker to have wonderful features that I haven't found in any other program. Someone mentioned that they have a girl with Down syndrome who can retell a story but cannot write yet. We have found, by using Clicker, kids who have not been taught to write or given the opportunity to write can write. With those emerging writers you can create picture grids that can give these guys success. We create grids with choices so that kids have to be "thoughtful" about what they write. (From a language point of view, I don't like any of the pre-made grids--at least those for Clicker 4.) My AT team has to give a training on Clicker 5 tomorrow, so I guess I'll be boning up on the new features tonight. We do work to get these kids from needing picture support to being able to using Co:Writer.

As far as Co:Writer SE, I think it is worth the price compared to the other word prediction programs for the Mac. (I do like Word Q for the pc.) I think the OS 9 version of Co:Writer was problematic. This new one is great,in my opinion. It has linguistic prediction and does a great job of predicting my kids' invented spellings. It also has a feature where you can create a word wall and topic dictionary. I have done that for pen pals. The best thing is that it can attach it to anything that you write including Instant Messenger, blogs, and emails.

The other interesting thing for me is that the problems for educators are the same in North Carolina as Minnesota. I am the only special educator on my school's literacy committee. At the last meeting for how to improve reading at Highland, the gifted and talented guy made a comment that Highland wouldn't be on the "LIST" for AYP if it weren't for special education. He then looked directly at me. (Sigh)

Anyway, thank you for making all this great information available. I wish your entire class the best.

Barb Wollak
Saint Paul, MN

7:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home